Template quality
35 Markdown templates passed structural validation for titles, explanatory context, table separators, and column consistency.
Engineering toolkit · Engineering toolkit
BESS QA/QC Toolkit
Make readiness a traceable evidence decision—not a status color.
Templates, controlled JSON policies, passing examples, and Python audits connect requirements, checks, evidence IDs, revisions, owners, deadlines, closeout, and acceptance.
Engineering question
How can project requirements, checks, evidence IDs, revisions, owners, deadlines, and acceptance decisions remain traceable through BESS delivery?
Gate FAT, SAT, commissioning, closeout, document control, calibration traceability, and handover evidence with inspectable policies and scripts.
System and evidence boundary
Evidence control spans the delivery lifecycle.
Each gate leaves project authority with the responsible reviewers while making missing, stale, inconsistent, or unapproved evidence visible.
Delivery lifecycle
- 01Supplier reviewRequirements, documents, interfaces
- 02FATFactory checks and evidence IDs
- 03Shipment + site receiptCondition and controlled records
- 04SATSite checks and deviations
- 05CommissioningMeasurements + calibrated instruments
- 06AcceptancePunch list, residual risk, approvals
- 07HandoverControlled revision and signed decision
Traceability graph
- 01RequirementAcceptance reference
- 02Check / testUnique Check ID
- 03Evidence recordUnique Evidence ID + location
- 04RevisionSupersession chain
- 05ApprovalControlled state
- 06Acceptance decisionAuthorized human gate
Unified readiness gate
- 01Status policyVocabulary + blocking states
- 02Deadline auditExplicit as-of date
- 03Conditional completenessFields required by workflow state
- 04Source coverageEvery controlled file evaluated
- 05Pass / findingsMachine-readable report for human review
Verified results
Figures keep scenario, units, source, and evidence class attached.
Every visual below points to its source data or retained source format and to the release- or commit-specific implementation behind it.
Unified readiness-gate dashboard
Generated from the repository passing record and example policies with as-of date 2026-07-21. One controlled row passed with zero findings; it is demonstration data, not a project readiness claim.
- Provenance
- 61d89bf · 61d89bfd1ca4 · verified 2026-07-28
- Reproduce
python scripts/generate-open-engineering-figures.py --sources-root <audit-root>
Validation and evidence
What passed, what was demonstrated, and what remains unvalidated.
One hundred forty-two tests and four subtests passed across templates, readiness, deadlines, completeness, evidence, calibration, punch-list, document-control, and handover audits.
Automated suite
142 tests and 4 subtests passed across status, deadlines, completeness, readiness, evidence, calibration, punch-list, document-control, and handover controls.
Passing examples
Repository examples exercise clean commissioning evidence, calibration history, punch-list closeout, document control, readiness, and handover decisions.
Authority boundary
The scripts report controlled findings; they do not approve work, waive a requirement, interpret a contract, or replace an authorized acceptance decision.
Shortest verified path
Pin the audited source before running it.
git clone https://github.com/mohammadrezwankhan/bess-qaqc-toolkit.git
cd bess-qaqc-toolkit
git checkout 61d89bfd1ca49800e786c501dda82ea951b55a01
python -m unittest discover -s tests -v
python scripts/validate_templates.py
python scripts/audit_readiness.py examples/readiness-gate-passing-record.md --status-policy config/readiness-status-policy.example.json --completeness-policy config/readiness-completeness-policy.example.json --as-of 2026-07-21 --require-source-coverage --format jsonVerification environment: Python 3.14.6 on Windows 11. Commands are concise entry points; repository documentation remains authoritative for setup details.
Documentation map
Go directly to the useful evidence.
Engineering boundary
The artifact cannot qualify the decision by itself.
- The templates and scripts do not replace project contracts, applicable standards, authority approvals, OEM procedures, safety plans, or project-specific acceptance criteria.
- Example policies and records are demonstrations. Each project must control its own status vocabulary, blocking states, deadlines, owners, evidence rules, and approval authority.
- A passing automated gate proves only that configured structural controls passed for the supplied records; it does not prove physical completion or technical acceptability.
- No confidential employer, supplier, site, contract, or client data is included.
Related professional context
Follow the evidence into adjacent work.
Use the pinned source, inspect the evidence, and keep project authority with a qualified human reviewer.
Open 61d89bf
Return to open engineering