Situation
FAT/SAT evidence, deviations, NCRs, punch items, commissioning records, and warranty feedback could lose context between teams and gates.
Engineering case study
BESS QA/QC from acceptance criteria to handover.
At TotalEnergies from 2019 to 2022, I worked across BESS portfolio intelligence, quality-cost drivers, warranty cases, standards, FAT/SAT evidence, NCR follow-up, and handover discipline.
Situation, task, action, result
A common review path for records that normally live in separate systems.
Task
Connect inspection discipline with engineering feedback and supplier accountability without reducing quality work to document collection.
Action
Aligned requirements, test procedures, acceptance criteria, owners, evidence references, NCR status, and closure decisions.
Result
Reviewers could follow an item from planned acceptance through test evidence, deviation handling, and handover disposition.
Six-step traceability spine
The row is useful only when the review chain stays intact.
- 01Requirement
Identify the approved technical or quality obligation.
- 02Procedure
State how the obligation will be inspected or tested.
- 03Acceptance
Define the pass condition before execution begins.
- 04Evidence
Link the controlled record, log, drawing, or inspection result.
- 05Deviation
Assign failed or incomplete items to a named NCR and owner.
- 06Closure
Record due date, objective evidence, decision, and handover status.
Public proof artifact
Inspect ten sanitized rows before deciding whether the full template is useful.
The sample contains template fields and example acceptance wording only. It includes no client data, test result, or confidential project identifier.
Deeper template
Request the 18-row working CSV structure.
The fuller template extends the sample across design review, supplier review, FAT, SAT, commissioning, NCR closure, punch-list control, and handover.
Evidence boundary
Public method, protected project data.
This case identifies employer, period, scope, and a reusable QA/QC structure. It does not disclose project-specific failures, suppliers, commercial values, or performance improvements that cannot be verified publicly.