Research notes · Engineering notes and validation guide

Battery Thermal Modeling Notes

Turn a thermal equation into an evidence chain another engineer can challenge.

An executable lumped-cell reference is surrounded by curated guidance for heat-source selection, boundary conditions, parameter traceability, data quality, uncertainty, and validation decisions.

Engineering question

What evidence chain is needed to move a battery thermal claim from an equation or source into a reviewable engineering decision?

Connect an executable lumped thermal reference to assumption control, boundary-condition review, source confidence, uncertainty, and validation traceability.

System and evidence boundary

The model is only one rung in the fidelity and evidence ladder.

The repository separates heat-flow logic, model-fidelity choice, and validation governance so a simple response is not mistaken for full pack evidence.

Heat-generation and rejection pathway

  1. 01Current + resistanceIrreversible I²R heat
  2. 02Entropic + external termsOptional signed sources
  3. 03Thermal capacitanceStored energy
  4. 04Convection + radiationBoundary-condition heat rejection
  5. 05Temperature + limitsTrace and exposure metrics

Model-fidelity ladder

  1. 01Lumped cellFast sensitivity and energy balance
  2. 02Module networkCell spread and coolant interaction
  3. 03Spatial modelInternal gradients and geometry
  4. 04CFD / FEA / experimentHigh-fidelity or measured validation

Validation evidence chain

  1. 01ClaimDecision-relevant statement
  2. 02Parameter sourceConfidence and provenance
  3. 03Model assumptionBoundary and omitted physics
  4. 04Test conditionProfile, sensors, environment
  5. 05MetricTolerance and uncertainty
  6. 06Human decisionAccept, revise, or escalate fidelity

Verified results

Figures keep scenario, units, source, and evidence class attached.

Every visual below points to its source data or retained source format and to the release- or commit-specific implementation behind it.

Validation and evidence

What passed, what was demonstrated, and what remains unvalidated.

Eighty-four tests and ten subtests passed for the executable thermal model and its validation envelope.

Executable envelope

84 tests and 10 subtests passed for integration methods, interval profiles, energy balance, radiation, reversible heat, external sources, limits, and invalid inputs.

Curated guidance

The public page selects the useful modeling and validation notes; achievement-practice files present in the repository are intentionally not surfaced.

Source confidence

Templates connect each parameter or literature claim to source strength, assumptions, test conditions, metrics, and decisions.

No qualification claim

The repository is a research and validation resource, not a calibrated cell, module, pack, runaway, or certification model.

Shortest verified path

Pin the audited source before running it.

git clone https://github.com/mohammadrezwankhan/battery-thermal-modeling-notes.git
cd battery-thermal-modeling-notes
git checkout 14e399fb20b37ae689f22189976fd259c2943970
python models/lumped_cell_thermal.py --profile-csv models/data/pulse_current_profile.csv --output-csv results/pulse_thermal_intervals.csv
python -m unittest discover -s tests -v

Verification environment: Python 3.14.6 on Windows 11. Commands are concise entry points; repository documentation remains authoritative for setup details.

Documentation map

Go directly to the useful evidence.

Engineering boundary

The artifact cannot qualify the decision by itself.

Related professional context

Follow the evidence into adjacent work.

Use the pinned source, inspect the evidence, and keep project authority with a qualified human reviewer. Open 14e399f Return to open engineering